Entertainment x BTS x Politics x EXPOSED



thimothee giving weirdo vibes like dicaprio. unsettled gay





Whaaat thheeee fuck, ALL GENDERS NOW? that's their way of giving back for the jewish pedophiles not siding with MHJ and NewJeans.

sf31.png






someone's having a weeeeird party here




Jew gay power. yeeeeey




I was sent this link and had to laugh



IT MAKES ME VOMIT, shame to this world




wre1.png

HAHA


qwr34.png



Who dat. TWS. poor guy. I even forgot who BTS is and how they look.



Yes, masonic sign



AWFUL





 
I am going to take this thread apart, because, once again, people who have no idea about this business, should mind their own....special needs/capabilities.




    • dance moves
    [*]Yes, the moves are either almost the same, or really the same. The question is who stole from who, because if you compare this loser shit


    View attachment 2843

    to this

    View attachment 2844

    this

    View attachment 2845



    or this


    View attachment 2846

    it's the exact same move, because that's what all Bang bands are doing - the same moves.

    The only one I haven't seen on BTS is the last one, with the hair flip. Yes, that was stolen from NewJeans. IF the choreographer came up first for them with the move, but it's a choreographer's issue related to whom the rights belong - is it the company, the choreographer, or band. My bet goes to Bang/company in terms of copyrights, for reasons explained already in the past.

    But yes, in the end, both groups are doing the EXACT same dance. When it comes to theft, it's not about wether it's the same two notes/sound/movements. It's about an entire product. The progression, or the atmosphere. It is sad, that people are spending more time and teach how to STEAL, rather than creating their own stuff.

    I told you this a long time ago - Bang's laziness, the principle of the company, the fact that they do the EXACT same thing over and over again - at the beginning it was within BTS, now within other groups of the company, is going to slap back, because for someone new to ...THIS, new to the situation, profession, issues - yeah, sure. It's the same thing.


    • outfits
    [*]
    Yes, it is the same outfit, or at least very similar, presumably both of the same age.


    View attachment 2847View attachment 2848View attachment 2849

    BUT - the concept of wearing numbered tshirt and overall has been there since day one -

    View attachment 2850



    even using the same overall-style with one side open

    View attachment 2851
    View attachment 2852


    Does it stick to the eye because of the ongoing battle, that both groups kinda look the same? YES.
    BUT AGAIN - that's what they all do. They don't exist. They are a product, with no brain, no will, no self-respect, being told what to say, how to behave, how to dress, lying to their fans that they are manipulating.
    ALL bands look the same, they all use the same principle, the same clothes - girls look and move like porn for pedophiles, guys wear for the first 7 years child-like outfits and then move on to taking off their clothes in the same way on the stage.

    They all use the same model. They are all replaceable and the irony is that while the clothes and "dances" stay, it's the people who are being replaced.




    • sticky phrases
    [*]
    The "real me" vs "super real me" - both are bullshit and the videos are neither related, nor are interesting. The level of stupidity is reduced to such an extent, that it is hard to say what was stolen.
    "real me"??
    Wasn't this the same bullshit concept of "persona" taken from Jung, a guy they never heard of and most likely wouldn't understand two sentences of his work? All to sound intelligent??



    vs

    View attachment 2853





    Moving on to the next bullshit
    sense of kinship and sense of yearning

    View attachment 2854View attachment 2855

    This one is stolen. Credit should go to Min Hee Jin. Though...I would pretend this stupidity wasn't her idea.
    What am I suppose to do with kinship and yearning?? What the hell? Just concentrate on music and dance, less on useless adjectives taken from wikipedia.
    Nevertheless, it is obvious, that Bang took her plans/idea on multiple occasions and used it for other bands WITHIN THE COMPANY. The legality of the issue is wether her ideas are copyrighted by the company.
    Again, we are moving around the same issue - is the company entitled to use the idea of someone - who is paid by the company for this exact purpose - creative side - on the product of their choosing, or not.
    It's no different than hiring someone to write a song for bts and bang decides to give it to TxT, or as a solo to Jungkook - the writer can't come and say - but I wrote it for BTS.






    • theft
    [*]Next Segment - and again, there is no PLAGIARISM, there is THEFT.

    It is the company's right to ask for MHJ's or any other employee's plans when it comes to other bands, for several reasons:
    1. to avoid similarities, especially since we are dealing with a very low level of quality, but more important so, you have to understand, that they use the same manipulative tools on either males or females, so obviously they need to make sure that no overlapping is being created, no usage of the same items from the bucket list.
    2. to collect ideas that might be more suitable for other projects - even within the band we hear it often that something is designed for a certain person, or for the entire band, or for a certain ensemble, but then one notices - "hey, this thing suits you better!"
    3. I believe that Bang saw more interest in Illit than NewJeans, of whom I personally only found out through the scandal. Maybe MHJ's pedophilic concept didn't had the success he thought, or maybe he realized that since the groups look so similar, only one can be pushed and he decided to go with illit.
    [*]

    View attachment 2856View attachment 2857View attachment 2858View attachment 2859View attachment 2860

    The postings of this user are confusing and don't make any sense in relation with the information she's providing - What is this article above? I assume it's translated from korean, because "hive" is how "Hybe" is being translated when I use google translator and "islet", later "eilet" I assume it refers to "illit".
    What is the relation between some article of unknown source, and the "Confirmed, Bang was involved in taking elements..."? None. There is no "confirmed".
    [*]






Conclusion:

Before the term "stealing" can be applied - here described as plagiarism - it has to be cleared by MHJ how the legality of the ideas created within the company for a company's group are protected of usage only by her vs the company's right to use them upon what's best for the company.
I have the feeling, that they are entitled to use whatever someone creates under a contract within the company, and that MHJ was stuck on this idea, that she owns the label, she owns the group and NewJeans are too stupid, prove over and over again their poor character, and have no reality grip, no realization that they are next to nothing in this market.

It is undeniable that Bang took major aspects from her propositions, but that's not the question. She was hired by him. Those things are regulated by contracts, for example when you are hired by someone to create a code, that code/idea belongs to the company. When you work as an architect for a company, the company can use your drawings/sketches for whatever purposes they want.
MHJ should't throw stones, but built another house, which is not made by glass, because there is no originality in her perverse pedophilic creations.

As far as Bang/BigHit/Hybe goes - should a court decide that their contract is valid - which they should - Bang depends too much on the "good company" image and as everything in life, including the laziness mentioned in the beginning, it comes back to you.
The contract says that it can be terminated in case of major breach of trust - what those people did, the members of NewJeans and Min Hee Jin, together with everyone involved in this scam, is ground for termination and a lawsuit for sustained damages, as well as punitive damages against NewJeans in the first place, because they are the ones committing a fraud and illegality.
This is very important to remember, because while MHJ's termination of contract was cleared by Hybe/Ador, NewJeans's contract termination was never recognized, so it is not MHJ who engaged in contractual fraud, but NewJeans's members.

If Bang wins in court and doesn't to the right thing, he is the one who will prove, that there is no meaning in the phrase "breach of trust".
They, NewJeans, broke the trust the company gave them, by causing tremendous damage not just to the company, but to other bands within the company.
Keeping them under contract would be a mistake and would annul any attempt to prove to the court how unlawful NewJeans's actions were.


This is what a very...bright deranged psycho fan wrote to my kind explanation about the situation of "theft", copyrights owner and this despite me pointing out in some cases, that indeed, her (MHJ) idea was used for another band within the same company- she is still employed by the company to create content. I also explained this aspect.

well....that's the world we're leaving. Poor girl, but also poor us.

 
Taking a small break from my work, don't know why it came to my mind, so I wanted to add a few words to this:







I like his deep voice





Yeonjun is an example of someone that could be successful, yet fails due to the people around him not having a clue, and of course, and mostly because of him.
He has the voice and the looks, also the bodily flexibility (though his split in gum is bad), and he is somehow in the middle, at least from the videos I've seen so far - there are 2 types of annoying faces in kpop: the too gayish/"cute" one and the too "mad" one, which look the same on everyone, which is why I can't watch them anymore. I often...skip their faces. 😆
Yeonjun is somehow in the middle, but he acts a bit like the jackass and probably thinks like NewJeans, that he is somehow special.
The video where he's wearing white shirt - that's bad direction - one can see the camera on his shirt reflecting through the shadow. I also want to point to the an issue I wrote about once or twice - they are so concentrated on digital content, that their performances don't look anything like normal - when you go on stage and the only thing you look at, and the only thing that the choreography moves around, is a CAMERA, it just doesn't feel right.
They are doing it for the content on the internet, but it has nothing to do with a performance.

Pick whoever you want, but for the purpose of this test, just pick a kpooper band you don't watch very often. no solo camera, but full recording and watch a performance of the same song at different shows. Be prepared. Choose your videos and play them one after the other.
You will notice - it is just annoying. You are looking at the same face in the camera doing nothing.

I am sorry to say, because it affects a lot of us, including women, but it seems more often the case that they get already bald in their 20s and it's not because of poor genetics.



lastly - I can understand BTS being on this list, but what is the reason for Eunwoon at no 1 and anyone in that list 1-10? Also it seems a bit weird, that Woonbin is at 9 while Hyunjin at 18?

 
I share the same opinion about Trump and much more


qr2.png



The account suddenly does not exist anymore, either way this is not only weird as fuck, as she is so much older than him, but also notice how they are so obsessed with drinking and MENTIONING the "we had a drink" and then another one and another one, as if this is a sign of ....I don't know....maturity? artistry?

Please - what is there to talk about music? None of them are musicians. One can talk about music but the idea of the discussion and the interview was to present it as a discussion amongst peers, amongst professionals. Which they are simply not.

hjh20.png
 
View attachment wallachswarriors-20241228_050314-1913123693.mp4






this weirdo I wrote about yesterday...

View attachment jii.mp4

ooooh myyyyy Gooood



Since I was talking....alright, it's writing, but I call it "talking"....a few days ago about this boreness, I found this clip -


View attachment hjetw.mp4




Yup. She is even worse than the last time I heard something with her peepy voice. What worsens the situation, is that the song is pointing exactly to everything that is bad about her - She doesn't have a voice for singing, when holding notes, you are exposed - it all comes out - wether you can control vibrato, intonation, controlling the note, so it doesn't scream, and much more.

For example - even though it is not THE best performance ever, but it's impressive and good in terms of theatricals, this is what a real voice sounds on long sustained notes








Typical BTS stupid choreographer - a dancebreak wasted for a stupid "choreography"

 

Regarding this yesterday's news, I forgot to add, that by now we know, that the company owns their official accounts.
Giving the NewJeans situation, it is also assumed, that - by logical conclusion - that they are not to have a secondary account, which creates confusion.
Jungkook's penis, ever so desperate for some action, used his dog's account, to post that bullshit against Bang.

Him unfollowing and deleting is most likely the result of orders within the company.
Talking about breach of contract...Jungkook created an unpleasant negative situation for the company, towards the band he is part of it, continuously (falsely) claims that he owns them everything, how grateful he is, blabla, but one little pussy is enough for him to go once again all crazy - or maybe more pussies, who knows, he was so thrilled to sing:

I had one girl (one girl), too boring
Two girls (two girls), that was cool for me
Three girls, damn, dude's horny
Four girls, okay, now you whorin'
(Hey, hey, hey, hey) I'm loose
I done put these shrooms to good use



Bang/the lawyers/advisors choose a good moment to delete those accounts, when it isn't obvious, that it's NewJeans related.

I would also stipulate, that since he is in the military, and the company knows very well, that he isn't stable mentally, or to be trusted, they banned his access to the official account.
Therefore his only option was to use a second account to make claims he knew damn well, it is an attack against the company and the contract that he signed. Bang should charge him for all the chaos.
Their (BigHit's) attempt to make it seem as if it wasn't so, place an additional burden to the situation and as always, I am the only one talking about it, because noone else dares.
Where are all the "koreanboo" "allkpop boo" etc NOT reporting about it, as in...what really went on with his actions and the truth behind it?




....
 
Back
Top