You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Those people seem to not understand - the issue here, is that they want to terminate a contract earlier, which they can do, according to the terms they signed. Meaning, they have to pay an amount that has appeared in the press as "estimated 300 billion KRW", about 225 million US dollar.
I can inform my phone provider, that I am terminating the contract earlier, but I still have to pay what was agreed upon, until the end of the term.
They also signed independently, so every time little miss Hanni Banni wants to fuck around on the stage, in hooker outfits, Bang gets paid, as long as he/Ador hasn't agreed to the termination of the contract.
I mentioned earlier, that I could have been wealthy and not live the modest life I am living now, trying to survive, if I would have signed the typical contract in the industry. I did not do so. I acknowledged the terms, I knew it wasn't for me.
I did not signed a contract, took all the money and benefits, only to run away when it comes to my responsibility and even act as the victim.
Not just NewJeans are the problem, but the people "showing support". Who know damn well, how contract works and that what NewHookers are doing is not correct. It's what I always say - they all want to be famous, not work, get all the money, luxury clothing, real estate, private jets, yet when it comes to responsibilities, they want to run away.
About 10 years ago there was this awful situation between Dr. Luke and Kesha, who claimed that Luke raped her when she was 18 years old, amongst other accusations and asked the judge to terminate her contract with him, which was forcing her to work with him.
Judge said no. After hearing both sides, New York Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich ruled against Kesha, stating, “You’re asking the court to decimate a contract that was heavily negotiated and typical for the industry.” The judge added, “My instinct is to do the commercially reasonable thing.”
If her claims are correct, imagine having to work for the guy who raped and abused you multiple times. By the way - another jewish scumbag.
If her claims are false, then she used made-up claims to get out of a contract she has obligations towards to fulfill.
This only makes Bang and their shit stronger. Because rather than concentrating on some shady businesses and issues with him and the company, people will be focused on a matter, where, at least for now, Bang/Ador seem to be the innocent party and those bitches are annoying every reasonable person.
Friday, The Hollywood Reporter reported that Kesha lost the preliminary injunction that would have permitted her to end her exclusive contract with producer Dr. Luke (real name: Lukasz Gottwald) and his label Kemosabe Records (which is owned by Sony). After hearing both sides, New York Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich ruled against Kesha, stating, “You’re asking the court to decimate a contract that was heavily negotiated and typical for the industry.” The judge added, “My instinct is to do the commercially reasonable thing.” So, considering the judge's decision — how much time is left on Kesha's contract with Dr. Luke now?
Unfortunately, that question is easier asked than it is answered. Though the details of Kesha's contract with Dr. Luke and Sony have no way of being known, according to what is public knowledge, it seems that she is not exactly near the end of the tunnel: As reported by the New York Daily News, Kesha will have to record six more albums to fulfill her contractual obligations.
Kesha and Dr. Luke's messy legal battle began in October of 2014 when both filed suits against each other. First, Kesha accused Dr. Luke of verbal and sexual abuse — she claimed Dr. Luke had raped her when she was 18 years old — and then, Dr. Luke went on to countersue Kesha for filing said allegations. The producer claimed the accusations were unfounded and nothing more than a tactic to get Sony to release the "Tik Tok" singer from her contract. As the complaint in Dr. Luke's suit read: "As part of the effort to get out of the Gottwald Recording Agreement, Kesha and Pebe have also orchestrated a campaign of publishing false and shocking accusations against Gottwald to extort Plaintiffs into letting Kesha out of the Gottwald Recording Agreement."
After filing the suit in 2014, Kesha’s lawyer, Mark Geragos, provided Billboardwith the following statement:
This lawsuit is a wholehearted effort by Kesha to regain control of her music career and her personal freedom after suffering for ten years as a victim of mental manipulation, emotional abuse and sexual assault at the hands of Dr. Luke. The facts presented in our lawsuit paint a picture of a man who is controlling and willing to commit horrible acts of abuse in an attempt to intimidate an impressionable, talented, young female artist into submission for his personal gain. Kesha is focused on moving her life and her career beyond this terrible time.
According to TMZ, Sony is willing to let Kesha work with producers other than Dr. Luke, but the site claims the singer's team fears the label will shut her out entirely if she does not record music with her longtime collaborator. According to PEOPLE, when giving her decision on Friday, the judge addressed whether or not Kesha will have to continue to work with Dr. Luke exclusively:
[Sony] are willing to allow her to record without any involvement of Mr. Gottwald ... and there are papers from Mr. Gottwald that say he will agree to allow her to record without his involvement ... She doesn't have to work with him.
Now the other side has come forward to say, 'We will let her record without Dr. Luke.' I don't understand your problem ... It's not in [the company's] best interest to not make money and not promote a recording artist.
Update: In response to the court's ruling, Dr. Luke's attorney Christine Lepera released a statement to The Rolling Stone:
The New York County Supreme Court on Friday found that Kesha is already "free" to record and release music without working with Dr. Luke as a producer if she doesn’t want to. Any claim that she isn’t "free" is a myth. The sound decision Friday by the Court in denying Kesha's motion for an injunction made it clear Kesha's allegations of purported abuse were unconvincing and that she had no basis to void record contracts and copyrights… The goal of Kesha's counsel throughout has been to obtain a more lucrative contract through a shameless campaign of outrageous claims they will never stand behind in a court of law.
As Dr. Luke has said repeatedly, the allegations against him are outright lies that have been advanced to extort a contract renegotiation and money. Kesha and her counsel have cavalierly subjected Dr. Luke and his family to trial by Twitter, using a vicious smear campaign to ruin his reputation for financial gain while failing to support their claims… It will further be shown that the incidents alleged never happened.
Legal experts explain what the settlement of Kesha and Luke's defamation lawsuit likely means.
www.rollingstone.com
The Jungkook foto is the same as earlier, but without the blurry faces.
WHHHHYYYYY do they keep this prostitution, with Jin selling his body for crazy fans. I don't wanna hear ANY of them, women or men, complaining about stalkers/fans, when YOU are the one demanding it.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Attachments
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Forgot to mention - the worst thing about BTS - their God damn stupid movements, that they've been doing it for more than 10 years. That Taehyung video with the hooker dancer? It's once again, BTS moves from other songs. Mostly moving the hands the entire time.
Attachments
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
I was sent this video and it's the same opinion I shared as well
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Also what the two here are explaining, was stated by me before:
Lawyer Ahn Se-hun:
The penalty related to NewJeans' termination of their exclusive contract is estimated to be at least 300 billion won and up to 600 billion won. NewJeans claims that they did not breach the contract; rather, they argue that ADOR and HYBE violated the contract, asserting that they have no obligation to pay any penalty.
NewJeans has expressed that they have no intention of giving up the rights to use their group name, emphasizing that it's not merely a trademark issue but a matter of their identity.
Legally, this could become a complicated battle. To terminate an exclusive contract, there must be a "material breach of contract," and even after a request for rectification, the issue must remain uncorrected.
Since HYBE and ADOR are separate legal entities, the matter becomes legally complex.It appears that NewJeans held the press conference without sufficient legal review, raising concerns that prolonged litigation could hinder their activities.
Lawyer Mun Yu-jin:
To terminate an exclusive contract, there must be a material breach of contract, and even after a request for rectification, the issue must remain unaddressed. While NewJeans has claimed a "violation of protection obligations" by ADOR, they have not provided specific reasons.
The contract stipulates a two-week period for rectification, but holding a press conference before this period elapsed was a hasty decision.The fundamental background of this situation involves conflicts between former CEO Min Hee-jin and HYBE, which is unlikely to constitute a legitimate reason for contract termination legally.
Given the nature of the idol industry, the agency's significant investment and risks must also be considered, making it difficult to terminate the contract based on emotional decisions.
Lawyer Heo Ju-yeon:
The reasons asserted by NewJeans are unlikely to legally justify contract termination.To terminate the contract, they must prove acts like "pushing out," actual damages incurred, and a breach of obligations by the contracting party. From a legal strategy standpoint, NewJeans' decision not to file for an injunction seems to be a tactic to wait for ADOR to initiate a lawsuit claiming penalties.
Lawyer Yang Ji-yeol:
The Ministry of Employment and Labor views the relationship between idols and agencies as that of equal contracting parties, making it difficult to hold agencies legally accountable for workplace harassment and similar issues. Regarding the alleged "disregard" comments directed at Hani, ADOR's position is that they cannot be held legally responsible because other members are also independent contracting parties.The demand for the reinstatement of former CEO Min Hee-jin is legally untenable. Since HYBE and ADOR are legally separate companies, it's challenging to link HYBE's actions to a breach of contract by ADOR.The legal nature of exclusive contracts is not an employment relationship but an equal contract, which narrows the legal standing of NewJeans' claims.
Lawyer Go Sang-rok:
NewJeans' choice not to apply for a provisional injunction to suspend the contract's effect could be a risky decision. Not applying for such an injunction does not grant them the freedom to continue activities, and careful legal procedures are necessary. Declaring that they will continue activities without basic legal protections could lead to more significant problems in the future."
Many of the people commenting seem to understand the legal issue and the problem with NewJeans. But as always, only their weird fans don't accept, not even from a legal stand point, the situation.
For example - the name of the band.
For those of you who have known me for years and have followed my writings, if you remember - I researched and listed everything Bang has registered as a trademark from the beginning.
I also explained, that you get a fee, just by someone in the news MENTIONING the band. It's the BRAND, the NAME. The PRODUCT.
This brings back a lot of things and issues I mentioned and keep talking about on a daily basis - they aren't musicians, dancers, they have no value as "artists". They are puppets, used to make money with. Being sold and put in a expensive ugly clothing and shiny box. Which seems to be enough for them.
Everyone knows Barbie and Ken. no one knows who's behind it, who gets the money. Barbie and Ken are famous, because everyone knows their name and face (well...not the leftist lunatics started with their terror), but you get the point.
What I would have done, if the name would have been so important, I would have considered my priorities and apply for an expedite injunctions, saying - there are reasons to terminate the contract due to breach of ...whatever....and due to the immense damages that could occur because of the long litigation time, I request permission to continue, under certain circumstances, performing under my name, which has been traded and belongs to ADOR.
This is a reasonable form of request.
It could be, that they breach the contract, so I am not asking to do whatever I want. I show to the judge and to the court of law, that I respect the process, in return I am asking also for consideration of the damages, that could occur form the wrongdoing of the other party.
This would be something where the opposite site, in this case ADOR/Bang, also gains if they agree to it - in the end they still make money from, because I would agree only to let them use the name, not the revenue.
I, my self, am curious, as to how this unfolds. Unfortunately, rather than being a legal matter, it is also a fight for public's acceptance.
Same as the lawyers and also per my previous remarks, they could get in big legal trouble if they appear as "NewJeans", because it's stolen property. The name. In this case.
They deserve to be jailed. But then, it wouldn't do good for Bang, nor the politicians. They would start with all the "feminist" shit, because of the idiots of fans. Nobody gives a damn about all the raped women and the children abused, but if someone like them simply run away with the money and with a TRADEMARKED name, if they were to be sent to jail, then the leftists would start a revolution.
Here you go. And in case that you don't understand , because it's not your profession, I am happy to answer question, but there is NO plagiarism. NO "sampling".
THIS IS THEFT. When you steal something that it's a persons's WORK, PROPERTY, BELONGING, it's THEFT.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
All lawyers are correct - they have an issue with Bang, then you have the dispute between Min Hee Jin and Bang, but where is the breach of contract between ADOR and NEWJEANS??
By the way, I just mentioned above - public's eye.
Now listen here, how one of the lawyers in this article is making NewJeans the victims and ADOR/Bang the villain:
Roh Jong-eon, an attorney at Jone Law Firm, said that the termination takes effect from the moment it is notified and applies retroactively depending on the lawsuit's outcome. “Choosing not to file for an injunction indicates confidence in winning any potential lawsuit ADOR might file to confirm the validity of the contract,” Roh said.
Some in the industry interpret the timing of the press conference — before Ador’s deadline to respond to a notice of correction — as a move to immediately destabilize the contract’s validity and prevent the agency from exercising its authority over activities like advertising and broadcasting.
Can NewJeans truly free themselves from Ador?
Exclusive contracts between agencies and artists can only be terminated under specific circumstances.
Lawyer Roh says, “If the relationship of trust is irreparably broken, the contract can be terminated regardless of who is at fault. Based on current information, there’s a strong case for termination.”
NewJeans claims it faced unfair treatment from Ador, citing a HYBE internal document allegedly referring to plans to “abandon NewJeans and start fresh.” Roh suggests that such language could be deemed a severe breach of the agency’s duty to protect its artists.
======
Meanwhile other lawyers in the same article:
Others believe proving Ador’s breach will be challenging.
Ko Sang-rok, an attorney at PIL Law Firm, said, “The six demands NewJeans made, including the reinstatement of former Ador CEO Min Hee-jin and an apology for disrespecting member Hanni, may not constitute sufficient grounds for termination unless evidence clearly establishes Ador’s responsibility.”
Girl group NewJeans shocked the K-pop world by holding a late-night press conference on Thursday to unilaterally announce the termination of its exclusive contract with its agency, Ador.
www.koreatimes.co.kr
How legal experts assess NewJeans' prospects regarding battle with Ador
NewJeans attends a press conference regarding its contract termination at Space Share Samsung Center in Gangnam District, Seoul, Thursday. From left are Haerin, Danielle, Minji, Hanni and Hyein. Yonhap
Contract termination remains uncertain; large financial penalties could be reduced; even with a win, group may lose name
By KTimes
Girl group NewJeans shocked the K-pop world by holding a late-night press conference on Thursday to unilaterally announce the termination of its exclusive contract with its agency, Ador.
The move, described by the group as unprecedented, left the industry reeling. Observers had anticipated a simpler course of action, such as filing an injunction to suspend the contract’s validity.
Ador, a sublabel of HYBE, countered with a firm stance, saying, “We have not violated the contract, and the exclusive agreement remains valid until July 31, 2029, as stated in the original documents.”
NewJeans says that Ador’s contract breaches have already nullified the agreement, meaning there is no need for legal injunctions or penalty payments.
Regarding the trademark for the group name “NewJeans,” owned by Ador, the group declared, “We have no intention of abandoning this name, which holds all the meaning we’ve built since we first came together. We will fight to secure our rights to it.”
The matter is now expected to be decided in court following Ador’s legal actions.
K-pop girl group NewJeans' members at a press conference, Thursday / Yonhap Why did NewJeans hold a late-night press conference?
NewJeans chose to announce the termination of its contract instead of filing an injunction. Legal experts suggest this strategy allows the group to continue working while legal proceedings continue, as opposed to the operational freeze typically imposed during injunction cases.
In the Thursday press conference, the group said, “As of the 29th, we are no longer part of Ador and will act freely moving forward.”
Critics have questioned whether a group can unilaterally terminate a contract with the agency that nurtured and supported them.
Legal experts generally agree that artists can notify their agencies of contract termination, even if it is uncommon.
Lee Hyun-gon, an attorney at Saeol Law Office, said, “While it is rare for the ‘weaker’ party in a hierarchical relationship to initiate termination, there is no legal basis that limits this right to the ‘stronger’ party.”
Roh Jong-eon, an attorney at Jone Law Firm, said that the termination takes effect from the moment it is notified and applies retroactively depending on the lawsuit's outcome.
“Choosing not to file for an injunction indicates confidence in winning any potential lawsuit ADOR might file to confirm the validity of the contract,” Roh said.
Some in the industry interpret the timing of the press conference — before Ador’s deadline to respond to a notice of correction — as a move to immediately destabilize the contract’s validity and prevent the agency from exercising its authority over activities like advertising and broadcasting.
Hanni of girl group NewJeans speaks during a press conference regarding its contract termination at Space Share Samsung Center in Gangnam District, Seoul, Thursday. Yonhap Can NewJeans truly free themselves from Ador?
Exclusive contracts between agencies and artists can only be terminated under specific circumstances.
Lawyer Roh says, “If the relationship of trust is irreparably broken, the contract can be terminated regardless of who is at fault. Based on current information, there’s a strong case for termination.”
NewJeans claims it faced unfair treatment from Ador, citing a HYBE internal document allegedly referring to plans to “abandon NewJeans and start fresh.”
Roh suggests that such language could be deemed a severe breach of the agency’s duty to protect its artists.
Others believe proving Ador’s breach will be challenging.
Ko Sang-rok, an attorney at PIL Law Firm, said, “The six demands NewJeans made, including the reinstatement of former Ador CEO Min Hee-jin and an apology for disrespecting member Hanni, may not constitute sufficient grounds for termination unless evidence clearly establishes Ador’s responsibility.”
NewJeans argues that Ador’s alleged contract breaches have nullified the agreement, meaning there is no need for penalty payments. Yonhap Are penalty payments and the “NewJeans” name at stake?
NewJeans asserts that it owes no penalties due to Ador’s alleged breaches. Legal experts agree this depends on proving Ador’s culpability.
Even if NewJeans is found liable for breaking the contract, the reported penalty range of 400 billion to 600 billion won ($300 million to $450 million) may not be fully enforced.
Lawyer Roh said, “Courts often reduce penalties deemed excessive.”
As for the group name, it likely belongs to Ador unless the contract specifies otherwise. Lawyer Ko said, “Even if NewJeans wins the case, it would find it difficult to secure trademark rights unless a specific clause grants them ownership.”
Reporters crowd a press conference held by NewJeans in Seoul, Friday. Yonhap How might Ador respond, what could this mean for K-pop?
Ador has refrained from commenting on its next steps. Industry insiders speculate that Ador may pursue a confirmation lawsuit regarding the contract or seek injunctions to prohibit NewJeans from engaging in independent activities.
Given previous allegations of Ador's power struggle with former CEO Min, there is speculation that Ador will focus on proving her involvement in NewJeans’ decision.
HYBE has previously accused former CEO Min of attempting to seize control of Ador. This has fueled speculation that Min may have been involved in NewJeans' decision to terminate its contract.
Aware of these allegations, NewJeans clarified during its press conference, “We have not discussed the contract termination with former CEO Min.”
Legal experts suggest that if direct evidence emerges showing Min’s involvement in NewJeans’ activities after she departure from Ador, it could lead to a lawsuit for tampering, defined as third-party interference during a contract period.
However, attorney Roh said, “It would be difficult to prove tampering solely based on conversations between NewJeans and Min. Concrete evidence of plans and actions would be necessary.”
Conversely, lawyer Ko highlighted that even without direct evidence, the sequence of events — Min’s resignation from Ador and NewJeans' contract termination — could negatively influence the case.
“Such developments could be viewed unfavorably in court, even if tampering cannot be definitively proven,” Ko said.
The industry is closely watching the case, as its outcome could reshape the landscape of K-pop.
An executive at a major K-pop agency said, “A favorable ruling for NewJeans would heighten risks for agencies investing heavily in artists, potentially discouraging future investments and altering the contractual dynamics between agencies and artists.” This article from the Hankook Ilbo, the sister publication of The Korea Times, is translated by a generative AI system and edited by The Korea Times.
" ADOR was established to pursue the music and business vision of Min Hee-jin."
Old interviews where Min Hee Jin denied HYBE's impact on NewJeans' unprecedented success have resrufaced amid power struggle between the parties.
www.koreaboo.com
On one hand, she puts it out there, that Hybe/Bang has no involvement in ADOR, which is her company, the way she talks about, and that she was given full autonomy.
She wants to downplay the funding part, but ADOR, as a subsidiary, is funded by Hybe. She wants to pretend that the money came from elsewhere, without giving a name. Even if it was a private/anonymous donation. Ok. But at least SAY something. Not say - it wasn't Hybe's money.
Well then, who the fuck's money was?
The budget for NewJeans’ 1st EP wasn’t made lightly. There’s been a lot of talk about HYBE’s funding in the context of the production costs for four music videos. HYBE can’t confirm every production plan or expense at ADOR due to the autonomy we’ve been granted. Our budget is not significantly different from other companies or labels because it was based on my experience and market research.
The shit and their attempts to attack Bang is getting deeper:
"And that’s not all. Min talked about HYBE’s part in NewJeans’ debut in an even older interview with Billboard — from 2022. In the interview, she also claimed that HYBE played no part in the planning or execution of the group’s debut. The CEO further elaborated on ADOR’s autonomy despite being part of the multi-label company."
ADOR is a label that started with guaranteed autonomy, so it has no ties with HYBE’s management. They actually didn’t have any knowledge about anything we were going to release up until the first music video was released on July 22. [Laughs.]
Cine21:NewJeans debuted with global attention and their 1st EP 《New Jeans》 was an instant hit. <Ditto> and <OMG> was proof against a sophomore slump and NewJeans drove home an even larger success through taking the top 3 spot on the charts as well as placing within the Billboard Hot100 within 6 months of debut. Looking back from right before <Ditto> was released to now, how does it feel?
MHJ: There’s a lot going through my mind now. I’m not really the type to worry about superstitions. Right now, I’m getting ready for our next album. It’s going to be something completely new so I hope you all are ready. I remember the moments right before releasing <Ditto>. I thought my heart was going to explode. <Ditto> meant a lot to me, even on a personal level.
Cine21:What do you mean?
MHJ: As the title suggests, ‘Ditto’ was meant to build relatability and furthermore has the meaning of making up.
Cine21:You strategized on announcing the pre-release <Ditto> and the single album 《OMG》 pretty closely with the 1st EP 《New Jeans》. One could say it was a pretty similar yet different strategy from releasing 4 songs and MV back to back without any introduction. Why did you decide to release one single at a time when you could have collected more songs for an EP or go straight to a full LP? I’m curious if this was related to the long term success of the first EP.
MHJ: The idea behind this winter's record was pretty genuine. To give back. A response of sorts on the attention and love we received on the first project. So we led with a warm hearted song <Ditto>, opened a holiday pop-up, and decided to continuously donate a part of the record sale profits. We wanted to put together a package that felt like a Christmas gift and thank everyone for the amount of love they gave towards the 1st EP. It was cancelled due to Covid but originally the NewJeans members were planned to visit a children’s hospital on Christmas day as well.
Cine21:Instead of Hybe’s producers, NewJeans music is being made by producers from BANA, a label that was founded by the former SM Ent employee Kim Kihyun. Why did you decide to work with BANA? I want to hear what the process of getting NewJeans’ music ready was like.
MHJ: The premise that I might be expected to work with HYBE producers sounds a bit weird. I think there’s a couple misunderstandings because ADOR started as a label within HYBE. To put it bluntly, ADOR is a company founded to allow Min Heejin do music and business the way she desires to. This also means that the company will be run differently from the pre-existing media industry systems. The mission of a company holds a lot of meaning. If someone asks how I’ve been able to work 20 years in the idol industry even though I originally had no interest in it, you could say that it was the desire to provide an alternate vision and new music that doesn’t exist yet in the mainstream market. This is the reason I said that “[their] concept is their music itself” right before the launch of NewJeans.
I am not a songwriter or a lyricist, just a producer that has nothing to do with copyright. The flip side of this means that I can do my work without being restrained by a song’s composition. This also means that ideally, Ador’s music is borderless and free of constraints. So working with those who understand my music tastes was much more important than creating an organized system. BANA’s Kihyun is an old friend from my SM Ent days. We became friends because we both did not agree with the company’s style and system at the time. I guess we were the troublemakers. And that’s also why we both left to create our own companies. When I launched ADOR under HYBE, I strongly argued for a complete “lack of interference on creativity and our independent operations”. And as such, HYBE has no say or relation to how ADOR operates and runs production. So it feels weird when I sometimes see ADOR’s music style grouped with SM or HYBE.
BANA members and I have known each other for a long time. Kihyun in particular already knew why I was founding ADOR, my long term goals, and my music tastes so it was easy working with him. ADOR’s music does not rely on a single songwriter. As mentioned earlier ADOR was founded to realize my music and vision. So our organization and and the way we work is different from other companies. I collect music and decide [their release]. For instance, NewJeans’ 1st EP was built from a library of demos I’ve been collecting since before NewJeans was even put together. So a lot of the guesses on the songwriter’s intentions are all wrong. I share a lot of opinions with Kihyun in the process of collecting songs, finishing them, and working out their details. And then we work out the details like mixing, mastering, and vocal directing under my direction.
Cine21:The fact that the music that a former creative director and now producer chose and released became one of the most widely successful music of the year means a lot. How do you interpret the music’s success?
MHJ: There are a couple factors that I emphasize, such as melodic progression or vocal style. Personally, I have very much not been a fan of the way K-Pop typically handles melodic progression or vocal styles. The need to include a high pitched part, awkward and sudden rap sections, everyone sounding the same, etc. Of course, I do respect those who enjoy this style. But I do not like these elements and wanted a world in which music without those elements can exist. I started leading overall production in order to be in control of these details.
‘Songwriting’ as a concept is fairly open-ended these days. It’s rare for a beat maker to also take on top lining and most don’t even recognize the concept of a top liner so most people don’t understand the role they play in making music so it’s understandable that most people fail to understand. The importance of a beatmaker versus a topliner varies song to song so I can’t say which is more important. And as such it’s arguable that the role of a director that manages this overall process has grown. All this means that a song isn’t made by one person. If you hear demo samples with different toplines on top of the same beat, I’m sure this will make a lot more sense. The outcome might have been very different if the beatmaker or the melody maker directed the vocals instead of myself. 250, who gained a lot of recognition through working with us, has always been a polished producer and has given music to other idol teams as well. But the output has been very different from ours. It might be obvious but the style of a final product changes depending on the final stakeholder’s decisions. A lot rides on my decisions. So word choice of asking how I “chose” is right yet wrong. I’m someone that wants the change the game. I wanted to break the existing notion on how K-Pop can be successful. I became a producer and a CEO and yet I still desire to work in a creative environment that is free of prejudice. I hope lots of different thoughts appear in this market. This is coming from from a former art director that had no interest in idols. This should be your takeaway.
Typically, when something is successful, people like to look at the result and understand the process by going backwards. But there are serious limitations to this given that there is a finite amount of experiences to analyze and draw conclusions out of. The reality I experienced and have built is often very different from the 3rd person’s presumptive perspectives, because everyone works differently and approaches their lives differently. The title of Art Director, Creative Director, and Producers all meant different things per industry and per person. Never assume things with little basis. Things that feel new do for a reason. Using old conventions to understand newness could already be an outdated practice. One needs to think outside the box to think differently. Easily defining how success is made is not something every record producer is capable of. But if you must know how I think, I could say this. Perhaps it was the harmony of an attractive beat and melody paired with a easy to listen vocal with all the overwhelming aspects removed. There is a reason I wanted to be strong at the basics.
Cine21:Lets talk about the MV story. There has bee a trend of adding lore or an overall narrative but this seems absent in NewJeans. Was this a deliberate move away from the way the K-Pop industry has been obsessed in lore? Or was this to give each album a different concept?
MHJ: To summarize, I’m a person that is against K-Pop’s perspective on lore (laughter). NewJeans is a team that lacks the K-Pop element of lore. But one could argue that our message, which we have been sending pretty consistently, is a narrative of sorts. And if that’s how you understand us, that’s very welcome. I am a curious person by nature and I always look for fun. NewJeans albums will continue to state this similar message over different formats.
I’ve read someone argue that they enjoy NewJeans for their lack of being complicated by lore building that K-Pop has been pushing as of recent. Of course, NewJeans has their own stories and concepts but they seemed to like that NewJeans was not hastily building a narrative, followed by the creator’s attitude of forcing symbolism and for the audience to analyze it. NewJeans seems to be the result of Min Heejin asking questions such as “What is a concept to an idol” or “How do you build a story” and such. How did you reach a conclusion and apply them to your work?
It feels like the community has been rather sensitive on the ideal of a self driven, independent idol. But it’s ironic that they idealize this yet welcome lore that seem to treat them as characters. Aren’t these two opposing concepts? I have not been able to actually measure the effectiveness of what the K-pop community calls ‘lore’ (laughter) so even as someone who has worked in this industry for several years, I question whether we’re just overgeneralizing from the opinions of the select few. Several factors play a role in creating popularity so it’s difficult to measure the actual impact of what we call lore. Because of that, I had no reason the ‘push’ for lore. NewJeans will adapt and provide a topic that is appropriate for each moment in time, as seen in how we released <Ditto> as an answer to the debut album last summer.
Cine21:I heard that ‘deer in a snowfield’ imagery in the <Ditto> MV was directly from you. What was reason? Personally it reminded me of <Stand By Me> and <All That Heaven Allows>.
MHJ: When I first heard the intro to the <Ditto> demo, I was absolutely taken back by the chorus. It was as if it expressed everything I wanted to say. And a picture came into my head. A deer that randomly pops out in a white snow field and the faces of people who meet the unexpected. As if to represent the relationship between consumers and NewJeans who debuted out of nowhere. I was thinking of those who witnessed the beauty of freedom in an open, empty environment and their desire to own it. The desire to chase after something beautiful, while unintentional, puts constraints on the subject and ironically reduces their charm. I thought of this bizarre relationship and thought it’s similar to our reality. I understand people may not trust and question something they have yet to experience but I wanted to state that we will shine more brightly when we are left free. I even thought that that might be something that everyone actually wants. I collected <Attention> <Hype boy> <Hurt> <OMG> in 2019 but <Ditto> in particular was produced [from my ask] for the winter of 2022. Ironically, The misunderstandings from the 1st EP was what made <Ditto> happen. I wanted to wrap up the misunderstanding by reconciling [TL note: she’s being very deliberate w her word choice. She’s not calling it a fight, she’s not saying she’s apologizing. She wants to make up for what’s happened and what’s happened is a misunderstanding]. As if we could transfer the heat of the summer to the warmth of the winter. So I was even more sure that I wanted to build an album that felt like a gift.
Cine21:I heard that you gave director Shin Wooseok complete creative control. Is this how you approach all your work? If there are parts that you are more involved in versus not, I’m curious how you decide which is which.
MHJ: The way I work is always different for each project. When I was on <You Quiz on the Block> two years ago, I saw the episode with Dolphiner Films Director Shin Wooseok. I felt like the way he approaches work and sees the market is similar to me. As in, he was not fantasizing about the media industry, he had strong beliefs, he worked without borders, etc. Of course, I wasn’t planning on working with him back then. While working on 《OMG》, I wanted to give a completely different impression than that of the 1st EP. In order to do that, I needed a completely different direction in the MV as well. And Director Shin came into my head. I wanted someone who had never filmed any K-Pop MVs and I needed a creative mindset that thinks without borders. After meeting with him, I was excited about his lack of interest in the K-Pop community and his unique work ethic. I still remember his first question when we held our first meeting after we decided to start working. He wanted to know the long term plan and the future direction of NewJeans. He said he needed to know the overall direction in order to figure out what story to tell. And I was so relieved. I can’t not be excited when I thinks something is important and someone asks that very thing. His work style and his thought process was very similar to mine as well. He’s someone that can do the A to Z by himself. And I know, better than anyone, that they do not need anyone else to interfere with their work. Most importantly, I wanted to something that I couldn’t imagine so I wanted to stay out of it. So I volunteered as assistant. I asked him to do everything he needs to and that I will support from every direction, whether it be costuming or other filming needs. I then briefed him on our mission, the context of this industry, the future direction of NewJeans, and the role of this particular album. And we discussed all of these for a while. We weren’t neccessarily just discussing the concept or the narrative. And this goes for the deer as well. I let him know that “All I wanted was for him to understand the ‘why’ behind the impression I got. No need to be boggled down in the look and feel of it. I don’t want to buldoze over your thought process.” It’s not a specific order, but rather a producer’s “why” could be a part of the concept or the inspiration. I think Director Shin did a great job with both <Ditto> and <OMG>. I wanted <OMG> to be considerably unique since <Ditto> is something that everyone would enjoy. And he delivered. I recall being surpirsed after reading the first scenario of <OMG>. The paradox of the K-Pop industry, the direction of NewJeans, both were well implemented.
The dance MV have a strong appeal of their own. I know that there is value to visual side of it so we made several dance MVs. The actual MV needs to hold a larger message and deliver something more. I wanted to say that there things that are more important than the view counts. I work with young children so this is something I honestly needed to do.
Cine21:I’m curious about the leadership of Minheejin, as someone who decides on a direction, listens to her coworkers and draws a larger picture.
MHJ: I talk with everyone involved about the ultimate end goal. I get rather specific about the plan and how we get there. Because I have a very clear plan on how I want to do my work. Same goes for the NewJeans members. I take a lot of effort in explaining what I want to do, what I want to say, and why this is important to us. In a way, this is more important than explaining a concept or a storyline. It’s building the right foundations. One of the essential roles I play is driving this directive such that those intentions show themselves as needed.
For instance, I argued for a specific style of choreo, an unconventional and freestyle style that’s different from the common idol knife choreography, way before NewJeans came together. ADOR’s performance director Kim Jooeun agreed with and understand my intentions well, and it’s all in the result. <Hype Boy> was an example where we received an initial draft and did a complete refresh. I re-explained the style we need and asked her to redo the choreo. I’m not a choreopgraher so I can’t ask for a specific move or detailed movements. I just do what I can to explain the mood and direction I’m looking for. And the result was great. It was a viral hit as a challenge, and we continued to collaborate. We went with the original draft for <Cookie> and <OMG> without editing them. Talented people just need a solid direction and support. Same goes for ADOR’s stylist Choi Yoomi. It’s easy working with her since we share similar perspectives. Maybe it’s because I built this label to work a little more comfortably. I work well when my mind is at peace. And that happens when I work with those that share similar values. Only then can I lead and tell them to follow me. Micromanagement has it’s time and place. It’s not an always or a never. Micromangement is often seen in choreography since many people are working together closely. To draw the best result, small details need to be explained and directions need to set. This isn’t easy since the other person has feelings. Everyone is different and best I can do is adapt to each situation and subject. Good results aren’t easy. Director Shin Donggul, who directed <Hype Boy> and <Cookie> used the expression “mothership”. It sounded like consolation.
Cine21:From SM Ent’s Visual and Art Director to Creative Director, to HYBE’s CBO, and now to ADOR’s leader. I imaging there was a process in learning how these roles differ. I wonder why you decided to become a leader and a executive producer after coming to ADOR. Business and production could’ve been separately managed and yet you chose to do both; why?
MHJ: I founded a label to be an executive producer and took the role of a CEO to be fully independent as an executive producer. Creativity is a field that requires close communication with business management. This doesn’t imply reckless spending behavior. Success in creativity within pop culture is measured by the numbers. This isn’t pure art. So to me, creativity and business have been on the same line of importance. It’s been 20 years since I’ve been a part of this industry. I’ve witnessed a lot of mistakes and mishap over those 20 years. If someone asks what I’ve learned over these 20 years, it’s, “Ah, that’s what I should avoid.” and “I should avoid that.” I’ve witnessed plenty of conflict that arose from misunderstanding between creativity and business. Simply spending a lot of money without proper planning does not lead to good creative output nor business output. Many people use the phrase “HYBE funds” to explain everything, but it’s not an expression I agree with. Invested funds and actual label management strategy that utilize them is separate from HYBE and is fully under the label’s control, and furthermore I’ve received a couple other investment opportunities of simiar value at the time from companies other than HYBE. I had several options at the time and regardless of the investor, my number 1 request was always ‘creative independence’ and ‘nonintervention’, so it didn’t have to be HYBE. Then this leads to ‘why I had to choose HYBE,’ but I will stop here since that will lead to a completely different topic than this interview.
The 1st EP budget was not hastily planned at all. Lots of folks mentioned HYBE’s capital regarding the 4 MVs and their production budget. HYBE has no say over ADOR’s production plan or how the funds are spent, because we were promised autonomy in business management. Our budget is not too different from other companies or labels, because the production budget was planned from my experience with budgeting and market research. If anything, we were much more efficient given the amount produced. And sure, budget helps, but a lot of it doesn’t always lead to good results. I try my best to balance spending and creativity based on my experience in the field. And that’s one of the factors that allowed for a NewJeans to be paid so quickly. Account balancing is different for each company and is a top secret so not a lot of people actually know how they work. Maybe it’s because of this lack of understanding, but I saw a lot of people talk about how NewJeans were paid 2 months into debut. Some were confused between creative neighboring rights [TL:no idea what this is] and account balancing. Some were arguing that it was possible because we’re a part of a large company.
Given how rare this is in the industry, I don’t not understand. At least based on what I’ve seen, nobody has been paid this quickly. But nobody has 3 debut title tracks. And nobody had all three enter the charts so quickly and stay on top for the long run. The market is changing so obviously there aren’t examples to compare us to and so I understand people are guessing. We didn’t pay NewJeans because we were nice, and it wasn’t because HYBE is big. It happened because the necessary conditions were met. To summarize, it happened due to a balanced budget plan, a triple title strategy, and the outcome of being successful pretty quickly. When I first decided on three title tracks, lots of people were surprised and said a lot of things, but I was able to make the decision because I was a producer and yet a CEO. Filming several MVs was also possible because I was a producer and a CEO. If you’re a producer, you need to understand that pop culture is not free from the numbers. I able to think about how to create those numbers and alternate solutions preceisely because I’m a creative and an administrator, not an administrator that has nothing to do with the creative side.
Cine21:I heard that you had no interest in K-Pop or the idol industry when you were in school. What did you have trouble accepting while working within the K-pop industry? What were some industry wide practices that you wanted to ignore?
MHJ: When I was in school, I had no interest in idol culture. If anything, I was a bit more on the critical side. I think that’s what allowed me to join this industry. To be honest I constantly ran into situations that were hard to accept while working. I don’t think it was just being angry, but more that it logically didn’t make sense. I can’t pick just one or two things. Perhaps I built this label to prove that those outdated practices or prejudices can be broken.
Because we’re talking about ‘something that I couldn’t understand about this industry’, something recent comes to mind, even though it’s a bit off topic. People who talk about me as a successful fan or the theory that I am projecting my own past into the MV. Taking imaginative guess that’s far from the truth and assuming that they’re correct is already dangerous in itself. I felt pity when I saw people attacking based on those assumptions and couldn’t begin to understand where it started go wrong. Isn’t attacking somebody based on unconfirmed guesses actually just making up whatever reason to hate? It felt like I was witnessing this persistent dark side of the industry. It’s not limited to this recent incident, but it’s always a bit scary when I realize some people are too deep in idol culture beyond understanding.
Cine21:Maybe it’s because you’re a producer that’s been getting a lot of attention, but you’ve been receiving off criticisms from people who don’t understand the industry, and from a third person perspective, it feels like I saw you being over criticized pretty often. How do you feel about this. How are you managing all this on a personal level and as a CEO.
MHJ: The idol industry as I understand is full of various contradictions and unique characteristics. It’s a complicated topic, but the idol industry is typically composed of trainees in their teens that peak in their early 20s. The industry is characterized by companies that find these underage trainees and train them. Because of this, prospective idols look for stability in management and fandoms desire that the most for the person they support. But it’s also true that due to this, fandoms maintain a hostile attitude towards these companies by default. Of course, there’s been many incidents and unsolved issues so I understand that there are criticisms. I imagine over criticizing and being excessively absorbed in the culture is the result of these unsolved issues that have just become characteristics.
My relationship with NewJeans, at the very least, is different from the stereotypical entertainment label to artist relationship. A new kind of relationship within the media industry. And I didn’t pop out of nowhere, I’ve been in this K-Pop industry the last twenty years as content producer. I realize, however, that I can’t change everything overnight. It’s up to me to prove through my attitude and outcomes. It’s been 6 months since I launched NewJeans. My name’s on everything we do so I couldn’t slack off in any aspect. Content, TV appearances, ads, and marketing: I am consistently trying to do what I can do provide new direction and fix some of their respective issues. It’s a small thing, but NewJeans albums did not contain random assortments of photocards that are quite popular among idol fans. This is because I wanted people to buy our products for what they are, not because of marketing gimmicks. I was glad to see the excited response but I was also curious. One of the experiments I wanted to do while launching ADOR and NewJeans is how far I can get with just the basics. This is why we didn’t do a YouTube promo campaign. I wanted to compete with the foundations; music, choreo, and content. It’s easier to evaluate reality the cleaner your data is. And once you set that as your basis, it’s easier to decide where to go next.
If anything, they’re sweet consumers that are excited by photo cards. They move me. If this their attitude now, I’m wondering how excited they can be once I’m going all in. Just a random thought but I’m suddenly just very thankful. It’s fun creating content by bouncing back and forth between the fans. If you look at just my title, you could ask why a CEO is knee deep in all this work but my title doesn’t change what I do. If I need it, I make it and new things that are perhaps hard to explain. I wanted to create a new kind of relationship with our consumers. The reason I founded ADOR was to do something I enjoy. ‘Fun’ influences a lot. ‘Fun’ is the foundation of the ‘entertainment’ industry. And that’s what I’m focusing on. And because we’re in our early days, I am indeed involved in leading a lot. But good results will serve a good reference point for people at ADOR.
Then I discovered this post:
I draw attention to this part:
Additionally, since NewJeans' songs were produced by BANA without involvement from HYBE's A&R team, HYBE only holds the rights to distribute and sell the albums/digital content. Furthermore, as NewJeans members are registered as co-producers of the songs, HYBE cannot take away the inherent rights of NewJeans and BANA under any circumstances.Moreover, according to various sources, NewJeans and the producers receive a significant portion of streaming revenues. For example, "Circle index points" considers revenues based on MP3, BGM, and streaming so 1 billion index amounts to 1 billion KRW (716,000 USD) that will in part go to NewJeans as the performers and for some songs songwriters.Therefore, even if NewJeans declares contract termination, the rights to the songs will remain with NewJeans and the producers, so we should continue to enjoy NewJeans' good music through legitimate channels.
I draw the attention to it for 2 reasons:
1) in the KoreaTimes article, it was stipulated, that judges can reduce the penalty fees, if they are deemed too high. The more NewJeans is trying to make it seem more valuable, the lesser the chances to have the penalty reduced.
2) I don't know the terms of their contract, so I explain in general, because it's the same situation as with BTS and StrayKids.
- even if you are co-something writer/producer, or even the MAIN writer and producer, the standard contract includes you SELLING the rights to the company. It's the case of Taylor Swift, who bitched about it when it didn't suited her anymore. They may appear as co-writers, but it doesn't mean that they have any rights;
- many labels have their own writers/producers under contract under the same circumstances - they write/produce a song, depending on how good and established they are MAYBE get a cut, but the rights go to the company/label/management.
- otherwise imagine the disaster of a company having their producers/writers not allowing for stupid Butter to be played, or the choreographer not allowing BTS to dance to his awful dyslexic moves (God, PLEASE let it happen).
I can't imagine a situation where NewHookers were given any rights of deciding over the songs...hahaha. And it surprises me to read this coming from a big NewHookers account, since you know...hidden staffers. It seems that everyone is blind.
What it could be is, that pedo-Min hee Jin signed a contract with this BANA, where they get the rights...? But again, it doesn't make sense, for the reasons mentioned above, it causes immensely harm to Hybe. On the other hand, Bang seems to be the type of desperate gay pedophile, who is easy to manipulate, once he meets people like him - see his now sudden gone friendship with Scooter.
The more I read about all of this, the...stupider it makes MHJ and NewHookers look.
Attachments
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
An example, of what I've been experiencing for the past years when it comes to my writings - it took me a total of about 4 hours to gather the information in the posting above and then write about it. I credited every single link, including the ones, that were only quoting other posts.
I am not getting paid for my work, and I don't see you donating even a small amount each day.
Then there are people who read my postings and quote my findings/updates without credit. 4 hours of work and then someone will always come and steal.
Again, a post made by their "fan" account. i personally cannot access the article quoted.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
The most problematic part of this stupid statement is to claim, that NewJeans are in a "highly favorable position in the legale battle".
I don't believe it.
The cherry on top - STRATEGIC MASTERSTROKE?
I'd call it universal stupidity. Stupid hookers 1/1.
If he has a copy of the "revised" contract, then please share it.
ADOR already sustained damages and they are entitled to every single cent these bitches have to pay.
What the "lawyer" means with the issue of trademark upon payment that shouldn't be as problematic as it seems....I can't imagine.
hmm...this isn't right. Disrespecting and shitting on signed contracts without consequences. If this would have been a "misogynistic" "right-extreme" boyband....noone would have broadcasted them.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Attachments
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Hmm..this sounds like someone took what I wrote and then trying to make it sound, as if they understand something.
The account is quoting a video in some asian language, probably korean, whoever that person is, is only there to feed their fans bullshit.
They don't seem to understand that....:
1) A&R is a stupid made-up name for a made-up job with no meaning, so that people working as assistants and the idiots they are working for, look more important in the public's eye. BANA, from what I read, is a "music and media label" and it's short for Beasts And Natives Alike.
A&R means artist and representation. Something like, in BOTI's terms (meaning MY terms) - they are the ones providing hookers and drugs.
2) IF Hybe doesn't allow permission, this does not mean at all, that they can get it otherwise.
3) I am not sure what it means in this context, but the recording was done within the Hybe studio. It doesn't mean, that they own automatically the copyrights. Just that...it's good to know...for now.
4) there is a very long list of the "contributors" of their album and I doubt that they all shared the copyrights. As explained from earlier days, that's where the money comes from. Not the billion streams, or touring. From copyrights.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Songwriters DO NOT own the copyrights just by definition. Most of them are getting paid - more established ones maybe around €5,000 to write a song. For the fee, they write the song and sell the copyrights to the company/singer/management, etc.
Even if that would be the case here, that BANA owns the copyrights - BANA is a label, so someone within BANA would have the copyrights, or someone within BANA who wrote the song, has sold the copyrights per contract to BANA.
Either Bang was stupid and foolish to allow a different company to enter their studio and own the copyrights to THEIR OWN KPOOPERS under contract, or ADOR under MHJ would have done such a stupid thing.
I can't imagine this situation, unless there is something else in the middle.
According to the public information provided, there are many "songwriters" on that album.
Taylor did NOT re-recorded the old songs, so that she could perform again. She re-recorded the old songs, so that she gets paid the revenue from the new recording. Otherwise everything goes to her old label/Scooter Braun.
The label owning the "master" decides what to do with the song - for example imagine me writing my own music and lyrics to a song, but the master, meaning the END PRODUCT of everything, after recording, editing, etc...belongs to a gay jewish company that I signed with.
Even though I own the copyrights to the music and lyrics, the fact that they own the master, means they get to decide where my music is played, get the revenue from the song as a "master", can use it for editing, remix, "sampling", decide where is distributed, so MY WORK could end up at some jewish gay pedo orgy.
I hope by now everyone understands what I mean.
This person who did the video and the ones quoting it, have no idea what they talk about, mix up definitions and misunderstand both the legal, as well as the artistic part of it.
I don't know what the agreement of NewHookers, BTS, SKZ, Beyonce, etc...with their respective labels are. But rarely, in fact I am not aware of any situation, where a label doesn't hold the rights to the master. They can't function otherwise. There is no company otherwise. There is almost nothing to cash in for them otherwise.
The fact that NewHookers made it public, in a threatening way, that they are going to keep using the name and perform, without paying any penalties, shows that they are aware of their own wrongdoing, yet think that they can get away with it.
You can't compare some lunatics with the power behind Bang and his people. For him it's probably not even worthy to sue them for damages, other than for the public's eye and because they deserve some form of harsh punishment.
I assume Bang's lawyers - BigHit's/Hybe's lawyers costs more per hour, than whatever the hookers could make in one year from Only Fans.
Follwing quote is from the article quoted below:
He added, “NewJeans has effectively placed the decision in the hands of advertisers and broadcasters, forcing them to choose between NewJeans and ADOR. This is only possible because NewJeans is a global idol group with immense purchasing power.”
it's exactly what I said, buy from a different point of view. They used blackmailing and public's manipulation, because they have no legal case.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Many say that the newhookers have been blinded by MHJ, but when it comes to BTS, TxT, SKZ and any other band, whose members have been blinded by the management, their own lawyers and their parents, people are silent.
One of their strategy to manipulate and gaslight fans, is to create this "babying" situation, where the fans feel that it is their responsibility to "protect" them and spend their young life attacking whoever doesn't agree to worship the kpoopers.
It is not just the management/company involved. It's the members themselves who play this "baby" role, acting "cute", shaving their armpits and legs, wearing toys and toddlers headband with glitter on their heads, looking like some weird creatures.
A company isn't there to "protect", the way fans believe.
The last thing a company/management,etc. is going to do, is to act in the artist's best interest. What's good for the company, is bad for the people they represent.
No matter how wonderful people think that either Bang, Min Hee Jin, J.Y.Park are, their billions, wealth and future depends on the exploitation of the people they signed a contract with.
I used to emphasize on Jungkook's and Taehyung's qualities and how they are being destroyed by the simple fact, that they are being dragged down, to be at the same level with the rest, because 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8+ people bring in more cash, than a single one.
They are being used by their parents, lawyers, but in the end, they fail because they don't want to work, take responsibilities and live in this idiot's shell where they think everyone is there to protect and worship them. When this isn't the case, they go all nuts, like Hanni Banni Only Fans Mommi, who made a national tragedy, that someone didn't bowed down deep enough in front of her.
They irresponsibly give people they aren't even in a contract with, to secure some privacy, authority and autonomy over their passwords, phones, private data, private stuff, share the same plate and spoons, drink from the same glas, undress and get dressed in front of them, but those people don't work for them, but for the management/company.
Most of the staffers are hookers obsessed with them, and the more stupid and desperate someone is, the more you see the name and face of his "assistant".
I know of hooker staffer BTS, hooker staffer Hyunjin, hooker staffer Jared Leto, because they fed him the nonsense they want to believe in, while sucking not just...you know what...but also all the benefits.
This is why in those instances people know of their existence. Those bitches brag about it, touch them in public and get deals, because they use them.
Throughout my life, I was able to get in contact with some important people and their assistants - it was more difficult to find out who their assistant is, than getting in contact/speaking directly to those people at an event.
THAT's the way things work, THAT's the role of an assistant and I assure you - those important people, even though evil and from the type of devils I stayed away, the smarter and powerful they were, the less the feeling, that their pretty, intelligent and elegant assistant, is there to fool them. Not all of them are stupid. They are all devilish. But you ain't going to find a hooker assistant touching them in public. Or sitting on their lap behind close doors.
Real men don't fuck assistants.
The way I see it - MHJ made a poorly coordinated attempt to take over a company, at the right time, but with the wrong puppets. NewJeans is one hell of a bad setting and Bang was right, to not invest in them.
For God's sake, do you know HOW MANY classical musicians and/or ballet dancers have been dropped from their management??
Do you know, how every now and then, I keep saying - people, stop interfering in a business you have no idea about, by claiming he is wrong, or she is wrong, attacking people because whatever personal obsession you have with someone who is LITERALLY NON-EXISTENT, the persona that they play DOES NOT exist, not even the looks are real - you have no idea how things work, how bad they are, how much work in the REAL world of music and dance is being poured into, while I have to stay in the back of some gay pedophile, watching hookers bitching about not being worshiped enough and taking away 250 millions?? And someone else's work?
Do you know how often similar take-overs/take-overs attempts are taking place?
I don't blame MHJ for trying, there is probably some truth in there with the authonomy she was granted, but then she wanted things that simply aren't hers.
You can't go against BTS with ....newHOOKERS. This is the battle.
Unless ADOR had a band and at least half of the amount of deals BTS has, or at least the potential to secure more deals - because...BTS is already dead anyways. not because of the military, but because they are old, ugly, and can't do shit - then she shouldn't have done what she did.
As I said, I am sure there are a lot of people, as always in life, on the other side, who are competing with Bang and the company. That's logical. They will, and probably have already, as I second some opinions about the parent's funding source, find some people to back them.
Even IF, at some point, there will be a ruling favouring a bit NewJeans, or maybe an agreement - as those things always end - NewJean's members, that I have no idea what their name's are, except that ugly face Hanni who isn't even korean, have proven why the company wasn't interested in them, they blackmail and threaten a company that poured millions in to their one shitty album, with tons of people working for them, they tried everything possible via public's manipulation, but it doesn't work that way - when you wear hooker clothing, you do sex-moves on the stage, almost all images of you are with you almost naked, yet wear some ugly Gucci or whatever outfit covering your body for an audit, to make it seem as if you are the innocent girl, and DON't respect the contract you signed for, FORCING the company to loose money and time with you, you already proven that you are not someone to be taken serious.
They signed a contract with ADOR, but have a problem with Bang, people want to make an excuse out of their behaviour, by saying it is MHJ who brainwashed them, they use Jungkook's penis, but when it suits they are innocent? Victims?
Hello,This is Macol Consulting Group, handling media communications on behalf of the law firm Sejong, which represents Min Hee-jin.
Min Hee-jin has filed a lawsuit with the Yongsan Police Station against former HYBE CEO Park Ji-won and HYBE Chief Communications Officer Park Tae-hee for violating the Information and Communications Network Act (hacking and communication violations), and against Dispatch reporters Kim Ji-ho and Park Hye-jin for defamation under the same law.Since April, defendants Park Ji-won and Park Tae-hee have actively used illegally obtained private conversations, adding false facts to create negative public opinion about Min Hee-jin.Dispatch reporters Kim Ji-ho and Park Hye-jin, fully aware of the malicious intent, have repeatedly published false information to defame Min Hee-jin.Today, Kim Ji-ho and Park Hye-jin published another article that is completely contrary to the truth, without fact-checking, and added their own speculation to one-sided claims, producing false content.Through this lawsuit, we hope a thorough investigation will expose the defendants' serious falsehoods and deceit, and that they will be held legally accountable.
[Dispatch=김지호·박혜진기자] ① 결론부터 말했다."어도어는 뉴진스를 보호할 의지도 능력도 없다."새... [더보기]
www.dispatch.co.kr
of course Bang is working with Dispatch together...She deserves it.
The worst part in this situation, is that it's going to be the same, as with the "me too" movement. It was all fake. They wanted Epstein and Weinstein out and they used the "abused" ones to do so.
Then we went back to "falsely accused". Now it's worse than before.
What will happen, is that this case will mobilize everyone in companies to create even worse contracts and make it nearly impossible to sue in REAL cases of abuse. Or bad-faith contracts.
They will use this example as excuse for being allowed to exercise more control and if if they are in the wrong, courts will decide to their advantage.
NewJeans fans claim, that the MHJ's messages clearly saying that she will sleep with whoever she needed, in return for favours, are faked. Manipulated.
I don't think that Dispatch would risk this kind of illegality. They can say they got them from an anonymous source. The more interesting part is, HOW did they got those messages, since the recipients were close NewJeans people?
The Korea Management Federation (KMF) expressed its concerns Tuesday over NewJeans' recent declaration to terminate its exclusive contract with Ador, urging the group to reconsider its decision.
forgot to mention, but you probably know it by now - though the White House has confirmed that Biden won't pardon his criminal pedophile rapist drug addict of a LOSER of son, he...pardoned him in the end.
....and what was I saying, about singers in the entertainment world and hookers for hire? That's why korean companies have their own hookers as staffers. What happens in the company...stays in the company.
South Korea is the Asian version of Ukraine. It's another jewish colony never fully supported, because of their (USA) interest with North Korea, used for the same purpose, and on top of it, SK has huge corruption problem.
Kind of a weird move, but we live the times where things precipitate before the new presidencies.
The fact, that people still refuse to see behind the lies of those jewish masters, amazes me. Rolling Stones...they call themselves THE music magazine of our lifetime...Obviously some jewish friends are sponsoring MHJ and NJ, otherwise this shit wouldn't have happen
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Attachments
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.